This is what some of my classmates comment on my discussion. Can you help me with the reply please. It's about the case of Ford Pinto.

To be honest with you. This time I do not agree with you as to the decision as to which Mr Lacocca should be prosecuted. It is true that the Lacocca played the role of "CEO within the Ford company at the time, and what on his shoulders was the responsibility of making certain decisions as well as directing strategies that could lead to it achieving its objectives at the time; this did not mean that Mr Lacocca was the highest authority since above him was the chairman of the administrative council who should give the last word should proceed to implement the suggested changes or continued with the launch as had been provided, which is why we can't make him look like the intellectual responsible.