This question will be sent to your Instructor for grading. Daivika and Amrita enter a contract whereby Daivika will feed Amrita 's cat for $200 while she is on vacation. Another part of the contract provides that Daivika will mow Amrita 's lawn for the summer for $500. Just before Amrita leaves for vacation, Daivika discovers that Amrita Joan's cat is not a domesticated cat but is instead a parither, and endangered species. In the area in which Daivika and Amrita live, it is illegal to keep or care for a wild animal such as a panther in a domestic setting. Daivika tells Amrita to forget about the contract as she misrepresented the nature of the animal, and that she can also forget about the lawn mowing deal. Amrita, being a somewhat reasonable person, feels bad about not telling Daivika the whole truth about the cat, and she is willing to compromise on that issue. Amrita, however, wants to enforce the yard mowing agreement part. What is her best argument? In your response, you are to discuss the nature of the contract that she entered into and the advantage or disadvantage of such a contract. And what action would the court take? [HINT: Her argument must be based on your readings in the textbook, and again, use the terminology that is used in the textbook.]