This questions is based on the article, "The pandemic could give way to an era of rapid productivity

growth," published by The Economist on December 8, 2020. The article discusses the prospects of

long-term economic growth after the COVID-19 pandemic subsides.

(a) According to the article, some experts on productivity trends seem to be pessimistic about the

prospects of productivity growth in the coming years, especially in the wake of the current pandemic.

What is the basis of such pessimism? Discuss what the article says about the two main groupings of

arguments and evidence offered by the pessimists. [9]

Answer:

(b) The article claims that "productivity is the magic elixir of economic growth". What does this

statement mean? Based on what you have learned in this course and from the article, what would

happen to per capita GDP growth in the long run if labor and capital increase, but there is no

technological progress? Why? Please explain your answer. [9]

Answer:

(c) The data presented in the article suggests that productivity growth in developed countries has

declined after the global financial crisis of 2008-2009 compared to the 1990s and the first half of

2000s. As the article points out, a major "question is why new technologies like improved robotics,

cloud computing and artificial intelligence have not prompted more investment and higher

productivity growth." The article examines three hypotheses that contend to explain this puzzle. What

is the first hypothesis noted in the article? How plausible is this hypothesis in explaining the decline

in productivity despite the advent of new technologies? [9]

Answer:

(d) What is the second hypothesis mentioned by the article as a potential explanation for productivity

slow down despite the new technologies? How plausible is this hypothesis? [8]

Answer:

2

(e) What is the third hypothesis mentioned by the article as a potential explanation for productivity slow

down despite the new technologies? How plausible is this hypothesis? [9]

Answer:

(f) The article claims that the pandemic in 2020 has quickened the pace of technology adoption and may

bring about a period of rapid productivity growth. What is the evidence behind the claim that the

exigencies of hard times may create opportunities for rapid change in later years? What examples of

such a phenomenon are mentioned? How may the process work? What roles can governments play in

ensuring that the potential productivity is realized? [10]

Answer:

(g) Currently the U.S. economy is operating below its production capacity and the Fed has pledged to

continue an expansionary monetary policy until the economy reaches its production capacity.

Consider two scenarios about the productivity trends in the US economy in the next several years: (1)

Continuation of productivity trend observed in the past decade (2010s); or (2) An enhanced

productivity growth compared to the 2010s, as argued in the article. If the Fed maintains its current

pledge and policy, under which of the two scenarios will it start tightening monetary policy earlier?

Why? [6]

Answer: