This semester we've discussed a number of articles that consider how public international law is able to respond to modern realities (cyberattacks, cyber influence operations, climate change etc.). Based on the public international law principles you've learned this semester, how do you think international law is/is not suited to adapt to modern realities? Support your argument by referring to at least one example from the discussion readings canvassed this semester.

Please respond with short reflective piece addressing this question. Ensure that you connect your analysis to the principles covered in class and at least one discussion reading.

You will marked on your understanding of the key principles of public international law as well as your ability to think critically about core concepts. The quality and clarity of your writing will also be taken into account.