Thomas Flanagan was an audit partner and key member of manage- ment (vice chairman) at Deloitte LLP, based out of the firms Chicago office. During the latter part of his career, he managed a large number of public company audit engagements. Based on knowledge obtained from key members of management of one of his audit clients, Flanagan learned that the client would soon be purchasing another company. Knowing that the value of the acquired company would rise upon the news of the purchase, Flanagan purchased stock in the acquired com- pany. As such, he engaged in insider trading. As the subsequent investi- gation would reveal, Flanagan traded in securities of at least 12 of his audit clients during 20052008. In fact, he made more than 300 trades in shares of the firms clients over this period. He concealed his actions by lying on his independence disclosure filings with Deloitte, not reveal- ing the existence of several of his brokerage accounts that would have identified his actions. Ultimately, the SEC uncovered his actions and notified Deloitte. Flanagan resigned from the firm, and Deloitte subse- quently sued him for breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, and breach of con- tract based upon his misconduct. The firm ultimately won a judgment against him. As part of a legal settlement with the firm, Flanagan gave up about $14 million in pension and deferred compensation, according to court papers filed by his attorney. A spokesperson for the firm stated Deloitte unequivocally condemns the actions of this individual, which are unprecedented in our experience. His personal trading activities were in blatant violation of Deloittes strict and clearly stated policies for investments by partners and other professional personnel.In August 2010, the SEC charged Thomas Flanagan and his son with insider trading in the securities of several of the firms audit clients. The SEC alleged that Flanagans illegal trading resulted in profits of more than $430,000. On four occasions, Flanagan shared the nonpublic information with his son, who then traded based on that information for illegal profits of more than $57,000. The SEC also instituted administrative proceedings against Thomas Flanagan, finding that he violated the SECs auditor independence rules on 71 occasions between 2003 and 2008. The Flanagans agreed to pay more than $1.1 million to settle the SECs charges.In October 2012, Flanagan was given 21 months in prison for trading on insider information about the accounting firms clients. Flanagan, who pleaded guilty to a single count of securities fraud in August 2012, was also sentenced to one year of supervised release and fined $100,000. Securities fraud carries a maximum punishment of 20 years in prison. Flanagans plea agreement called for a term of three to four years in prison, and prosecutors sought at least 37 months.a.Why is owning stock in ones client considered inappropriate? b.Why is it important that auditors be independent of their clients? c.Why did Deloitte take Flanagans actions so seriously? d.What do you think might have led Flanagan to make such poorprofessional and ethical decisions? e.Assume that you were working on one of Flanagans engagements

and you discovered that insider trading was occurring. What pro- cedures should the audit firm have in place to encourage you to report the inappropriate behavior and yet protect your career?Source: The description of this case is based, in part, on facts disclosed in the case Deloitte LLP v. Thomas P. Flanagan, Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, No. 4125-VCN and SEC Accounting and Audit- ing Enforcement Release No. 3164.