Thomas is on trial for killing his sister, Jane. His defense is that Jane was actually killed by Jane's ex-husband Max. Max has left the country and is currently living in Brazil, where he is beyond the jurisdiction of the court. However, Thomas explains that Max felt guilty about Thomas being prosecuted for the crime, so he sent Thomas a letter in which he confessed to the crime. The letter is properly authenticated as having been written by Max. Thomas seeks to admit this letter into evidence in order to prove that Max, and not Thomas, is guilty of killing Jane. Is the letter admissible? Group of answer choices No, it is hearsay, and there is no hearsay exception which can possibly apply. Yes, it is admissible to prove that Max was the killer. Perhaps. It is admissible to prove Max is the killer, but only if there are corroborating circumstances that indicate that the letter is trustworthy