Three engineers are working in the government engineering office (GEO) as inspectors for newly constructed residential buildings. The three engineers can be listed as follows: 1. Engineer 1 is a architectural engineer 2. Engineer 2 is an electrical engineer 3. Engineer 3 is a mechanical engineer The three engineers were assigned to review the residential building before being received by Owner from the Modern Construction Company (MCC). The inspections comments for each engineer can be summarized as follows: a. Engineer 1: noticed that MCC has changed construction specifications after being reviewed and approved by the government engineering office. The building is complying with only 75% of GEO technical standards. b. Engineer 2: Air conditioning wiring system is designed by AC-Tech Company which owned by the father of Engineer 2. During inspection, Engineer 2 noticed that the AC wiring design is not reviewed for building safety requirements. MCC offered two months employment contract through the AC- Tech Company to review the project for safety requirements. C. Engineer 3 noticed that the ventilation mechanical system is design with low quality materials that would have negative impacts on building residents. Engineer 3 proposed to MCC to redesign the ventilation system and he would get a 12-month free rent for 2-bedroom apartment. After completing the design, he will also write a report to authorize the building for use and occupancy. What the three engineers should do or should have done to keep an ethical and professional practice and obligations ? Answer this question in the provided spaces below. 1- Explain the ethical dilemma(s) in this case facing Engineer 1, 2, and 3? ( /4 points) CLO4 2- Write three ethical obligations of Engineer 1, 2 and 3 as professionals working GEO? (Be specific in your answer as related to this case.) ( /6 points) CLO4 Engineer 1: supposed to 3- Write three ethical issues that would face the three Engineers in this case, ( 16 points) CLO4 Engineer 1: 72 points) Engineer 2:( /2 points) 4- What actions should be taken by Engineer 1, 2, 3 based on NSPE code of ethics? Write three actions based on the NSPE code of ethics and using applicable code items in code of ethics section III and III. (When using NSPE Canons, write section number only and do not copy it) What Engineer 1 should do in this to avoid having an ethical Based on applicable items in dilemma with his employer ? NSPE code of ethics Action 11 12 pnt) Answer of this section should be in the form of Example : 1-2-c, or 1l-1-a, or IIl-1-b Based on item from sec 2 pnt Based on item from set. It: 2 pnt Based on item from sec. Ill: 12pnt What Engineer 2 should do in this case to avoid any violation of code Answer of this section should be of ethics? in the form of Example: 1-2.c Action 21 12 pnt) Based on item from sech /2 pnt Based on item from secil: 12 pnt Based on item from sec.lt: 72 pnt What Engineer 3 should do in this case to avoid any violation of code Answer of this section should be of ethics? in the form of:Example: 1-2- Action 31 12 pnt) Based on item from sec : 12 pnt Based on item from sec. It /2 pnt Based on item from sec. e 2 pnt 5. What Engineer 1 should do in this case based on moral beliefs using the utilitarian theory ? Answer should be specific to case. 12 points) 6- What Engineer 3 should do in this case based on moral beliefs using the duty ethics theory? Answer should be specific to case.( 72 points) Error List: Error Code E1 E2 E3 Error Description Ethical dilemma missing one or more element or part of the correct answer. Ethical issue is not related. Answer is not focusing on the character of the question (e.g. question is asking about Engineer 1 and given answer is based on Contractor) Answer is not related to question. Answer is not applicable to moral theory. Answer is too general Missing Code of Ethics item; either from Section I, II, or Ill. Same answer used above. E4 E5 E6 E7