Three friends enter into a pact not to eat sugar. They all agree that the person who goes longest without eating sugar will get $100 from the other two. Two of the friends end up eating candy after two months, and the third friend, Alex, demands $100 from the others. They refuse, and Alex sues. Will a court require the two friends to pay $100 each?

Yes, because Alex performed under a valid contract

No, because Alex did not provide consideration to his friends in return for their money

Yes, because of promissory estoppel

No, because the contract was insufficiently definite