Three friends from Minnesota rented motor scooters while vacationing in Florida. Steve, the first skier came to a stop sign on Gulf Blvd, waved at his companions and stopped. Joe, the second to approach, was going too fast to stop, veered to the left skidded in the sand. Tim, on the third scooter, was going so fast he clipped Steve's scooter, fell over Joe and slammed into a tree. Tim broke bones in his right arm and leg, which required surgery to repair the injuries. Tim filed a lawsuit against Steve and Joe in a trial court in Minnesota, claiming that each of his friends was liable to him for their negligent driving. A Florida statute specifically stated that scooter riders assumed the risks associated with driving scooters on the street with cars. Assume Minnesota law did not contain an assumption of the risk rule regarding scooters. The two defendants made a motion for summary judgment. Which state's law applies to this case? Explain