Three Texas investors were shareholders in TexasFastFoodSouth, Inc. which owned several What$-$A$-$Burger franchises in different south Texas markets located in San Antonio and the Rio Grande Valley. The franchise agreement with What$-$A$-$Burger stated that franchisees could not own the "same or similar" competing franchises in the same geographical area. The same three investors formed TexasFastFoodNorth, Inc. and obtained a Burger King franchise for the north Texas $($the Dallas$-$Fort Worth$)$ metroplex. Upon discovery of this transaction, What$-$A$-$Burger terminated its franchise agreements with the owners for violating the franchise agreement. What$-$A$-$Burger claimed it had franchises in north Texas and the shareholder would be in direct competition. The shareholders argued that since the What$-$A$-$Burger and Burger King franchises were in different geographical regions and owned by different corporations the franchise agreement with What$-$A$-$Burger had not been breached. Who is correct?