Tim Wu, a much quoted law professor, thinks the government should use the antitrust laws to break up Amazon.In a 2018 interview he said, "What I think is good about Amazon is ... they do deliver lower prices for people. The problem with them: No. 1, I think they can be rough on little companies."

We do not know whether there is a law library in Heaven. But if there is, we know that Judge Robert Bork is sitting in a very comfortable chair calmly drinking scotch and smoking cigarettesor at least he was until he read Professor Wu's interview. Why would Judge Bork be so annoyed at Professor Wu's comment? Can you imagine any argument that might make Bork inclined to support breaking up Amazon. (Big hint: make mention of the unique economics of businesses like Amazon, Facebook and Google.)