Timberline Lumber, Inc., sued Teal Developers, Inc., because Teal had failed to pay a $43,000 bill owed to Timberline. Both companies are incorporated in Montana and operate only in Montana. Timberline lost at the trial and now wants to appeal the decision. In support of its appeal, Timberline files a brief and cites to a case from Texas in support of its position. Timberline's argument focuses on the fact that the trial judge would not allow a witness to testify about the terms of the contract between it and Teal. Timberline supports its brief with an affidavit from a juror stating that hearing such testimony would have changed their mind about the case. The appellate court order's oral arguments and during them, a judge asks the attorney for Teal about legal advice they had given to Teal during the dispute. Answer the following questions: a. What court would have jurisdiction over the suit? b. Who is the plaintiff? Who is the defendant? c. On appeal, who is the appellant? d. What are the appellate court's options after it considers the appeal. What do you think it will do in this case and why? e. Will the appellate court consider the case from Texas when making its decision? Why or why not? Please include a discussion of the applicable doctrine and how it works? f. Can the attorney for Teal discuss their conversations with the client to the Court? Why or Why not?