Timeline One: -210 0 105 1 105 2 105 3 105 4 Timeline Two: -210 0 130 1 130 2 130 3 The appropriate rate of return for the risks in both business opportunities is r = 9%. The IRR for Timeline One is 34.90%, while the IRR for Timeline Two is higher at 38.71%. The NPV for Timeline One is $130.17, while the NPV for Timeline Two is lower at $119.07. Why is the Net Present Value lower on the second transaction compared to the first transaction, even though the IRR on the second transaction is higher? Multiple Choice Timeline Two has a lower NPV because it has lower risks than Timeline One Timeline Two has a lower NPV because it falls short of Market returns for the risks involved for a shorter period of time than does Timeline One Timeline Two has a lower NPV because it exceeds Market returns for the risks involved for a shorter period of time than does Timeline One Timeline One has a higher NPV because its discounted returns are higher each year than those of Timeline Two none of the choices is correct Timeline One: -210 0 105 1 105 2 105 3 105 4 Timeline Two: -210 0 130 1 130 2 130 3 The appropriate rate of return for the risks in both business opportunities is r = 9%. The IRR for Timeline One is 34.90%, while the IRR for Timeline Two is higher at 38.71%. The NPV for Timeline One is $130.17, while the NPV for Timeline Two is lower at $119.07. Why is the Net Present Value lower on the second transaction compared to the first transaction, even though the IRR on the second transaction is higher? Multiple Choice Timeline Two has a lower NPV because it has lower risks than Timeline One Timeline Two has a lower NPV because it falls short of Market returns for the risks involved for a shorter period of time than does Timeline One Timeline Two has a lower NPV because it exceeds Market returns for the risks involved for a shorter period of time than does Timeline One Timeline One has a higher NPV because its discounted returns are higher each year than those of Timeline Two none of the choices is correct