Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Titus purchased an electric coffee maker from Technosales Pty Ltd for $3,000 for his personal use. After two weeks, the coffee maker started to malfunction,

Titus purchased an electric coffee maker from Technosales Pty Ltd for $3,000 for his personal use. After two weeks, the coffee maker started to malfunction, even though Titus had been using it in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. He phoned Technosales, who told him to return it to them. When he unplugged the electricity from the back of the coffee maker, he received a severe burn on his hand from an electric shock from the power cable.

When Titus returned the coffee maker to Technosales, they said that they would return the coffee maker to the manufacturer for repair. Titus, however, demanded a refund, which they refused. They referred him to the term, printed on the sales receipt, which said "No refunds shall be given for returned items".

Advise Titus of his legal rights against Technosales Pty Ltd. Examine whether the exclusion clause is effective under common law and statute.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Law Express Tort Law

Authors: Emily Finch, Stefan Fafinski

8th Edition

129229549X, 978-1292295497

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

Do you think the banquet is a ritual? Why or why not?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

How can speakers enhance their credibility?

Answered: 1 week ago