Question
To aid interpretation the courts will sometimes consider extrinsic materials such as speeches made by the minister in parliament or the objects of the legislation.
To aid interpretation the courts will sometimes consider extrinsic materials such as speeches made by the minister in parliament or the objects of the legislation. Which of the following is the best example of this approach in the 21stcentury?
The literal rule,where the court simply looks at the words of the statute. | ||
The Golden rule,where the courts seek to avoid absurdity and consider the intention of parliament when there is some ambiguity. | ||
The purposive approach,where the court will look closely at the objects of the legislation iewhy did parliament pass this Act? | ||
The mischief rule,where the court will choose the interpretation that promotes the object of the legislation where there are more than one possible interpretatio |
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started