Tonya and Jeff were involved in a "spring$/$fall$"$ relationship$--$Tonya was a $23-$year$-$old recent college graduate who loved ice skating, and Jeff was a wealthy, $50-$year$-$old, thrice$-$divorced stockbroker. Despite their age difference, Tonya and Jeff were truly in love, and one night over dinner, Jeff proposed to Tanya.

Tanya wanted to marry Jeff, but give Jeff's trail of ex$-$wives, Tonya had a few demands. "I'll marry you Jeff," said Tonya, "but only if you promise to build me a mansion with an indoor ice skating rink." Jeff slipped the cocktail napkin out from under his glass of scotch and wrote on it the following words: $"$My dearest Tonya, if yo marry me$,$ I will build you a mansion with an indoor ice skating rink. Sincerely, Jeff Gillooly." Tonya slipped the napkin into her purse.

Tonya and Jeff were married $3$ months later, but the marriage was short$-$lived. Jeff filed for divorce only $6$ months later when he decided Tonya was a little too old for him. In the divorce proceedings, Tonya produced the napkin and demanded that Jeff deliver on his promise to build her a mansion with an indoor ice skating rink. Will Tonya win?

Group of answer choices

Yes, regardless of whether Jeff's promise was in writing.

No$,$ because the napkin was not notarized.

Yes, because Jeff's promise was in writing.

No$,$ because writing on a napkin doesn't satisfy the "writing" requirement of the statute of frauds.