Topic: Chapter 19 Best Evidence X F JOHNSON v. STATE | FindLaw x | Mail - Boyer, Dalisa - Outlook X Course Hero * *Homework Help - Q&A from Or x | G Small business interview questic x | Paraphrasing Tool | QuillBot Al x | + X C hcc.instructure.com/courses/109347/discussion_topics/988075 Update : M Inbox (11,304) - dal. WebAdvisor Main. classwork Pearson Revel aliexpress @ email [ BOOK Topic: Discussion - I... Paraphrasing SST Plagiarism Checker... Other bookmarks 22/SP-CJL-2610-61137 Courtroom Prantn/Sci Evidence > Discussions > Chapter 19 Best Evidence Rule FRE Rule 1002 Spring 2022 Account Home Discussions Dashboard Chapter 19 Best Evidence Rule FRE Rule 1002 Assignments All Sections Courses Syllabus Chapter 19 Best Evidence Rule (FRE): FRE Rule 1002, and FRE Rule 1001 - 1007 including Public Records (FRE 1005) and duplicate copies (1003). Smarthinking Online Tutoring The Best Evidence Rule (FRE Rule 1002) is discussed in this chapter, along with many alterations of it by the rules that follow it numerically. For purposes of this discussion, please review the court case at these web addresses is the same case (so you only need to review one of the url links) Calendar Academic Success https://openjurist.org/314/f3d/1279/united-states-v-romano https://scholar.google.com/scholar case?case=14620769958996613040 Inbox Chat Announcements https:/www.courtlistener.com/opinion/76042/united-states-v-anthony-graziano-romano/ History https://cite.case.law/f3d/314/1279/ Grades HCC Libraries Online The case included evidence against the defendant (and evidence that was disclosed to defendant) that would have been entered as Public Records (FRE Rule 1005) and as duplicates (FRE Rule 1003) because the evidence included public records of Defendant's prior convictions for felonies Studio and the evidence included records (or the lack of records) in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Records. The defendant was charged with possession of a Ruger Mini-14 .223 caliber semi-automatic rifle after having been convicted of a felony, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 5 922(g)(1), Microsoft Teams and, in Count Two, with possession of a destructive device that had not been registered to appellant in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Records, in violation of 26 U.S.C. 5$ 5841, 5845(a)(8), (f), 5861(d), and 5871. From there the case became complicated after the defendant meeting entered a plea agreement (in this case a lengthy document that also became a public record when it was entered into the court file, and then became part of the appellate record when the defendant appealed his enhanced sentence). http://members.j.net/rex/romanoappeal.html Help Microsoft Teams Even today, the government basically "creates" cases by acquiring records from pawn shops (which can be copies / duplicates) and then cross-references them with public criminal records to find felons who have pawned guns and then arrests the felons and sends them to prison. That classes technique creates easy safe cases, which some people consider to be of questionable value, and they also criticize it because it does not necessarily involve stopping more important crimes of violence and protecting the public (i.e. the felons have divested themselves of the guns by pawning Microsoft OneDrive them). Trials of such cases (e.g. the gun pawn cases) are very simple because they rely on the Rules stated above and essentially involve the entry of records (duplicates or originals) into evidence and then waiting to see if the defense attorney has any defense to present. That is why so many of the cases in up with plea agreements. Please discuss the chapter and the cases mentioned. Search entries or author Unread Subscribe Reply K 71OF 9:00 PM Mostly cloudy 4/29/2022