TorontoFlowers is required, as a condition of their contract, to supply theSuperTasty, a trendy restaurant, with50flower arrangements for tables andthree (3)large displays, twice a week.The cost is $3,000 a week.Toronto Flowers and Super Tasty have avalid contract.This week, it wasonetable arrangements short one day andtwo (2)short on the other.

(a) Theowner ofSuper Tastywas furious.Can Super Tasty argue that Toronto Flowers failure to perform the contract means Super Tasty does not have to pay at all?Why or why not?

(b)IfSuper Tasty refuses to pay Toronto Flowers(i.e., not paying the whole amount of $3,000)and Toronto Flowerswants to take legal actionwith minimum legal costsas soon as possible, which courtshouldhear this case?Briefly describe this court.

(c)Briefly describe a hypothetical reason that Toronto Flowers and Super Tasty may not have even an enforceable contract in the first place. Please explain the relevant legal concept you select.