Transcribed image text: Home Team Profile Headcount Report Productivity Report Today's Productivity Benchmarking Report In evaluating the results for your area, which of the following trends emerges from the data? Screen Summary Yesterday Area Rank Increased Overtime Hours lead to increased Productivity Rates #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 Productivity Safety Productivity Rate is negatively impacted by team size DVC (103%) LLF (100%) MDR (97%) MDR (103%) MDR (98%) JEC (99%) DVC (94%) DVC (100%) JEC (95%) KHJ (98%) JEC (89%) KHJ (98%) LLF (92%) MDR (94%) KHJ (86%) LLF (94%) KHJ (87%) DVC (94%) LLF (85%) JEC (92%) Schedule Adherence Schedule Adherence is inconsistent across periods of time Quality Larger teams have more Schedule Adherence issues Area Rank Last 7 Days #1 #2 #3 #5 #4 DVC (101%) JEC (99%) MDR (97%) Productivity KHJ (93%) LLF (90%) JEC (100%) LLF (99%) DVC (98%) MDR (94%) Safety KHJ (91%) JEC (93%) DVC (92%) MDR (88%) Schedule Adherence LLF (84%) KHJ (78%) DVC (103%) MDR (99%) KHJ (98%) Quality LLF (95%) JEC (95%) Note. The Benchmarking report shows performance of your area against four other areas within the FC. Letters in the table represent the Area Identification Code. Your area is MDR and is highlighted in blue. Results relative to goal for each area are shown in parentheses. Home Team Profile Headcount Report Productivity Report Today's Productivity Benchmarking Report In evaluating the results for your area, which of the following trends emerges from the data? Screen Summary Volume (Packages) Scheduled Hours Overtime Hours Increased Overtime Hours lead to increased Productivity Rates Productivity Rate Plan Actual Difference Plan Actual Difference Plan Actual Difference Yesterday Total Productivity Team 1 1,726 28 44 48.0 (-1,119) 211 1,720 620 (6) -21 (16) -1 Productivity Rate is negatively impacted by team size 599 10 9 51.3 Team 2 86,000 84,881 31,000 31,211 22,500 22,275 19,000 19,380 13,500 12,015 450 440 -10 6 10 49.5 (-225) 380 (4) (13) Schedule Adherence is inconsistent across periods of time Team 3 380 440 7 20 42.1 (60) -23 Team 4 (-1,485) 270 247 5 5 0 47.7 Larger teams have more Schedule Adherence issues 92 Volume (Packages) Scheduled Hours Overtime Hours Productivity Last 7 Days Plan Actual Difference Plan Actual Difference Plan Actual Difference Rate Total Productivity 602,000 584,413 (-17,588) 12,040 12,088 (48) 196 264 (68) 47.3 Team 1 217,000 208,320 (-8,680) 4,340 4,428 (88) 70 (22) 46.1 Team 2 157,500 156,713 (-788) 3,150 3,035 -115 42 51 (9) 50.8 Team 3 133,000 134,330 1,330 2,660 2,821 (161) 49 101 (52) 46.0 Team 4 94,500 85,050 (-9,450) 1,890 1,804 -86 35 20 -15 46.6 Note. The Productivity Report shows Planned, Actual, and Difference from the Plan for Volume in Packages, Scheduled Hours, and Overtime Hours. Productivity Rate is calculated as follows: [Actual Volume / (Actual Scheduled Hours + Actual Overtime Hours)]. Goal for Productivity Rate is 50 packages per hour. Differences in red parentheses highlight where Plan was not met. Home Team Profile Productivity Report Today's Productivity Benchmarking Report Headcount Report In evaluating the results for your area, which of the following trends emerges from the data? Screen Summary Schedule Adherence Headcount Today Planned Actual Tardies Increased Overtime Hours lead to increased Productivity Rates Today This Week This Month Total Attendance 175 164 6 90% 88% 89% Productivity Rate is negatively impacted by team size Team 1 62 57 2 89% 90% 92% Team 2 45 43 1 93% 87% 85% Schedule Adherence is inconsistent across periods of time Team 3 40 38 1 93% 96% 97% Team 4 28 26 2 86% 91% 86% Larger teams have more Schedule Adherence issues Note. Schedule Adherence Goal is 90%. Schedule Adherence is calculated using the following formula: [(Actual Associates-Tardies)/Planned Associates). Transcribed image text: Home Team Profile Headcount Report Productivity Report Today's Productivity Benchmarking Report In evaluating the results for your area, which of the following trends emerges from the data? Screen Summary Yesterday Area Rank Increased Overtime Hours lead to increased Productivity Rates #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 Productivity Safety Productivity Rate is negatively impacted by team size DVC (103%) LLF (100%) MDR (97%) MDR (103%) MDR (98%) JEC (99%) DVC (94%) DVC (100%) JEC (95%) KHJ (98%) JEC (89%) KHJ (98%) LLF (92%) MDR (94%) KHJ (86%) LLF (94%) KHJ (87%) DVC (94%) LLF (85%) JEC (92%) Schedule Adherence Schedule Adherence is inconsistent across periods of time Quality Larger teams have more Schedule Adherence issues Area Rank Last 7 Days #1 #2 #3 #5 #4 DVC (101%) JEC (99%) MDR (97%) Productivity KHJ (93%) LLF (90%) JEC (100%) LLF (99%) DVC (98%) MDR (94%) Safety KHJ (91%) JEC (93%) DVC (92%) MDR (88%) Schedule Adherence LLF (84%) KHJ (78%) DVC (103%) MDR (99%) KHJ (98%) Quality LLF (95%) JEC (95%) Note. The Benchmarking report shows performance of your area against four other areas within the FC. Letters in the table represent the Area Identification Code. Your area is MDR and is highlighted in blue. Results relative to goal for each area are shown in parentheses. Home Team Profile Headcount Report Productivity Report Today's Productivity Benchmarking Report In evaluating the results for your area, which of the following trends emerges from the data? Screen Summary Volume (Packages) Scheduled Hours Overtime Hours Increased Overtime Hours lead to increased Productivity Rates Productivity Rate Plan Actual Difference Plan Actual Difference Plan Actual Difference Yesterday Total Productivity Team 1 1,726 28 44 48.0 (-1,119) 211 1,720 620 (6) -21 (16) -1 Productivity Rate is negatively impacted by team size 599 10 9 51.3 Team 2 86,000 84,881 31,000 31,211 22,500 22,275 19,000 19,380 13,500 12,015 450 440 -10 6 10 49.5 (-225) 380 (4) (13) Schedule Adherence is inconsistent across periods of time Team 3 380 440 7 20 42.1 (60) -23 Team 4 (-1,485) 270 247 5 5 0 47.7 Larger teams have more Schedule Adherence issues 92 Volume (Packages) Scheduled Hours Overtime Hours Productivity Last 7 Days Plan Actual Difference Plan Actual Difference Plan Actual Difference Rate Total Productivity 602,000 584,413 (-17,588) 12,040 12,088 (48) 196 264 (68) 47.3 Team 1 217,000 208,320 (-8,680) 4,340 4,428 (88) 70 (22) 46.1 Team 2 157,500 156,713 (-788) 3,150 3,035 -115 42 51 (9) 50.8 Team 3 133,000 134,330 1,330 2,660 2,821 (161) 49 101 (52) 46.0 Team 4 94,500 85,050 (-9,450) 1,890 1,804 -86 35 20 -15 46.6 Note. The Productivity Report shows Planned, Actual, and Difference from the Plan for Volume in Packages, Scheduled Hours, and Overtime Hours. Productivity Rate is calculated as follows: [Actual Volume / (Actual Scheduled Hours + Actual Overtime Hours)]. Goal for Productivity Rate is 50 packages per hour. Differences in red parentheses highlight where Plan was not met. Home Team Profile Productivity Report Today's Productivity Benchmarking Report Headcount Report In evaluating the results for your area, which of the following trends emerges from the data? Screen Summary Schedule Adherence Headcount Today Planned Actual Tardies Increased Overtime Hours lead to increased Productivity Rates Today This Week This Month Total Attendance 175 164 6 90% 88% 89% Productivity Rate is negatively impacted by team size Team 1 62 57 2 89% 90% 92% Team 2 45 43 1 93% 87% 85% Schedule Adherence is inconsistent across periods of time Team 3 40 38 1 93% 96% 97% Team 4 28 26 2 86% 91% 86% Larger teams have more Schedule Adherence issues Note. Schedule Adherence Goal is 90%. Schedule Adherence is calculated using the following formula: [(Actual Associates-Tardies)/Planned Associates)