Trevor and Ursula are both merchants dealing in iron pipes. Trevor had sold pipes to Ursula for several years. One day, Ursula gave Trevor a purchase order for some pipe with some words added by Ursula that purported to bind Trevor to selling her pipe for "as long as Ursula needs iron pipe." Like most purchase orders, it was not signed by the seller Trevor. After two years, Trevor did not wish to sell pipe to Ursula any more. Ursula sued Trevor, saying that the purchase order was a binding contract for the sale of goods between merchants and that the purchase order was a binding contract even though it had an open term. If the court followed the result in Case 19.2,Cadillac Rubber & Plastics, Inc. v. Tubular Metal Systems, LLC,,

the purchase order would be reformed to be more specific

the purchase order would be binding on Trevor

the purchase order would be binding on Trevor because all purchase orders are enforceable in business

the purchase order would not be binding on Trevor because of indefiniteness