# TRUE OR FALSE 1. According to Carlson: On the postmodern view of landscape appreciation there is no appropriate appreciation of landscapes and thus no correct curriculum for landscape appreciation. 2. According to Carlson: the formal dimension is not only a fundamental dimension of aesthetic appreciation but also the only dimension. 3. According to Carlson, scientific understanding and common sense are two fundamental different ways to appreciate a landscape. 4. According to Carlson, a difference between appreciating art and appreciating landscapes lies in the fact that a work of art is completed at a certain time. 5. According to Carlson, landscapes have symbolic roles within different cultures. 6. According to Saito: weather is a "wanna-be" art. 7. According to Saito: the aesthetic experience of weather, unlike art, does not seem to have an overriding concern for inducing similar experiences. 8. According to Saito: the aesthetic experience of weather, unlike art, engages our whole body most directly and literally. 9. Saito's example of our experience with snow shows that appreciating weather is no different from spectating. According to Saito: poems and other writing may express experiences, which may not necessarily be pleasant in and by themselves, but can be appreciated aesthetically for defining the quintessential character of a respective season. # TRUE OR FALSE 1. According to Carlson: On the postmodern view of landscape appreciation there is no appropriate appreciation of landscapes and thus no correct curriculum for landscape appreciation. 2. According to Carlson: the formal dimension is not only a fundamental dimension of aesthetic appreciation but also the only dimension. 3. According to Carlson, scientific understanding and common sense are two fundamental different ways to appreciate a landscape. 4. According to Carlson, a difference between appreciating art and appreciating landscapes lies in the fact that a work of art is completed at a certain time. 5. According to Carlson, landscapes have symbolic roles within different cultures. 6. According to Saito: weather is a "wanna-be" art. 7. According to Saito: the aesthetic experience of weather, unlike art, does not seem to have an overriding concern for inducing similar experiences. 8. According to Saito: the aesthetic experience of weather, unlike art, engages our whole body most directly and literally. 9. Saito's example of our experience with snow shows that appreciating weather is no different from spectating. According to Saito: poems and other writing may express experiences, which may not necessarily be pleasant in and by themselves, but can be appreciated aesthetically for defining the quintessential character of a respective season