Two adjacent homeowners have a fence on their property line, erected before either of them moved in$.$ One homeowner wants to tear it down, while the other wants to leave it up$.$ In a deciding the case, which precedent would be most relevant?

Group of answer choices

A child wandered into a neighbor$$s back yard and drowned in the pool there. The court ruled that the pool$$s owner was liable for the death, since there had been no fence to protect neighborhood children from the pool.

A tree growing near a property line was struck by lightning and fell into a neighbor$$s yard. The court ruled that the cleanup costs were to be paid solely by the homeowner in whose yard the tree had grown, not by the neighbor into whose yard it had fallen.

Two neighbors were in a dispute about repainting a barn that straddled both of their properties. The court ruled that the neighbors were equal owners of the barn and that any decisions regarding the painting of the barn had to be approved by both parties.

A homeowner tore down a fence which she believed to be on her property, but it was in fact on her neighbor$$s property. The court ruled that she must pay to have the fence restored.

A homeowner erected a fence and painted it in gaudy colors, which a neighbor found to be distasteful. The neighbor sued and the court ruled that the fence had to be tastefully repainted or removed.