Two businesses sign a contract. The contract requires all work to stop at noon, local time. The parties disagree on the meaning of "noon." The court will A. look at the intent of the parties to define noon. B. tell the parties to settle the matter between themselves. C. apply the most reasonable meaning of the word noon. always apply the literal meaning of a simple word like noon. D. apply the literal meaning of the word since there is no ambiguity. Second question If the parties do not include a term in a valid contract, the court can A. infer a term requested by the non-breaching party. B. declare the contract void for lack of an essential term. C. declare the contract void for lack of a meeting of the minds. D. infer a reasonable term based on what both parties want. E. infer a reasonable term based on the past dealings of the parties. Ann buys a sandwich from a butcher. Ann immediately gives the sandwich to Carl, who eats the sandwich and gets food poisoning. Can Carl sue the butcher? A. Yes. Since Carl was harmed by the sale of the sandwich, he can sue for breach of contract. B No. Carl is not a party to the contract for the purchase of the sandwich and the butcher had no duty of care under tort law. C. Yes. Since Carl was harmed by the sale of the sandwich, the butcher certainly violated a duty of care to him. D. No. Carl is not a party to the contract to purchase the sandwich and so has no remedy. E. Maybe. Carl may be able to sue under tort law if the butcher was negligent in the preparation of the sandwich