Two questions about law, i have no idea.

A contract can include an amount agreed on to be paid in damages by a party if it should commit a breach. This type of clause is commonly referred to as a liquidated damages clause. O an acceleration clause. O an immediate possession clause. a specific performance clause. O an accounting clause.Cora enters into a contract to sell shoes to David to be delivered on January 1st. David will then modify the shoes and resell them. She knows that David needs these shoes on time because he can only sell his product at a premium price for the first two months of the year; then his prots decrease greatly. Dora does not deliver the shoes until February 15th. David sues claiming losses based on the high profit he would have received in the first two months of the year. Dora claims the loss should be limited to the normal profit. Who is correct and why'? David because the high profits were foreseeable Cora because loss is always based on normal business profits Neither because the court will assess damages based on what it feels is fair to both parties David because the victim is entitled to full compensation for any loss suffered as a result of the breach Cora because damages are based on punishing the wrongdoer and the normal profit calculation would do that