UESTiON 5 Ranger Stacey from the Queensland Department of Animal Welfare sees a tiger cub displayed for safe in a pet shop window. The pet shop is owned by Bob. Ranger Stacey charges Bob under the Dangerous Animals Act 2005 (Qld) which provides:- \"Any person who sells, lends or gives a dangerous animal to any other person commits an offence\". Tigers were defined in the legislation as a \"dangerous animal\". The matter went to Court and the Judge decided that Bob had not breached the Act because Ranger Stacey did not purchase the tiger cub. The Judge most likely relied on which rule in making the decision:- (a) Purpose Rule under the Acts Interpretation Act; (b) Purpose/Mischief Rule under common law; (c) The Literal Rule ((1) The Golden Rule