Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Under the common law, a person who owes a duty of care to another person is liable for the death or personal injury of the

Under the common law, a person who owes a duty of care to another person is liable for the death or personal injury of the other person if the death or personal injury is caused by the breach of duty. In order for Peter and Adele to be successful in their negligence claim, they will need to show that their injuries were caused by the company's breach of duty.

It will need to be shown that Adele's post-traumatic stress disorder was caused by the company's failure to provide a vegetarian option. It will also need to be shown that Peter's snake bite and hand injuries were caused by the company's failure to provide proper instruction on how to use the cooking facilities.

The company may argue that Peter and Adele assumed the risk of injury when they decided to go on the camp. The company may also argue that Peter and Adele contributed to their own injuries by not following the instructions on how to use the cooking facilities.

Under the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), a person who owes a duty of care to another person is liable for the death or personal injury of the other person if the death or personal injury is caused by the breach of duty. In this case, it will need to be shown that the company's breach of duty was the cause of Peter's snake bite and Adele's post-traumatic stress disorder.

Explanation:

Duty of care

Under the common law, a person who owes a duty of care to another person is liable for the death or personal injury of the other person if the death or personal injury is caused by the breach of duty. The principles governing the duty of care are set out in the case of Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562.

In order for a person to be liable in negligence, they must owe the plaintiff a duty of care. The duty of care is based on the principles set out in the case of Donoghue v Stevenson. The case establishes that a person owes a duty of care to another person if it is reasonably foreseeable that their actions or omissions could cause injury to that person.

In this case, it could be reasonably foreseen that if Adele was not given a vegetarian option, she would be forced to eat non-vegetarian food. It could also be reasonably foreseen that if Peter was not given proper instruction on how to use the cooking facilities, he could be injured.

Could you please be specific. Thank you

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Criminal Law Cases And Materials

Authors: Cynthia Lee, Angela Harris

4th Edition

1683284062, 978-1683284062

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

=+f) Are any six points in a row increasing (or decreasing)?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Always have the dignity of the other or others as a backdrop.

Answered: 1 week ago