Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

United States v. Durham 766 F.3d 672, 2014 U.S. App. Lexis 17267 (United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 2014) Criminal Law and

United States v. Durham 766 F.3d 672, 2014 U.S. App. Lexis 17267 (United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 2014) Criminal Law and Cybercrime Copyright 2020 Pearson Education, Inc. 109

Case: Timothy Durham and James Cochran owned and operated Fair Finance Company (Fair). Fair was an investment company that sold interest-bearing certificates to investors with the promise of extraordinarily high interest payments and the repayment of the investor's principal in five years. Rather than investing the clients' funds, however, Durham and Cochran used the money to support their lavish lifestyles. Following an extensive investigation, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) seized Fair's computer and other records and arrested Durham and Cochran. Over a period of eight years they had enticed more than 5,000 investors, many of them elderly or living on modest incomes, who lost $215 million. Only $6 million of assets was recovered.

Issue: The federal government sued Durham and Cochran for securities and wire fraud.

Critical Thinking Question: Are Durham and Cochran guilty of fraud? Did Durham and Cochran act ethically in this case?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Information Technology Control And Audit

Authors: Angel R. Otero

5th Edition

1498752284, 9781498752282

Students also viewed these Law questions