University of Southern California v. Superior Court

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3173350087242345864&q=University+of+Southern+California+v.+Superior+Court&hl=en&as_sdt=20000006&as_vis=1

Questions a. Summarize the facts of the case. b. According to the court, what duty does a a person who did not create a peril owe to others (do they have an affirmative duty to act to protect or aid another person)? c. According to the case, under what circumstances would make the duty to warn or protect from foreseeable harm arise? What are the unique relationships listed by the court that will give rise to this duty? d. Why did the court rule against the the defendant in this case?

Berberian v. Lynn

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15801504720967065277&q=berberian+v.+lynn&hl=en&as_sdt=20000006&as_vis=1

Questions: 1. Summarize the facts of the case. 2. What standard of care did the trial judge use for the jury instructions? 3. Per the case, what is the standard for care expected from 1. an insane person, and 2. a mentally incompetent adult? 4. Per the case, what is the standard care expected from 1. a child, and 2. physically disabled person? 5. Who won the case and why?