Question
Upset and furious, Robert prepares to leave Good Wood Lawyers but his illness causes him to faint. Luckily, Martin is able to catch Robert before
Upset and furious, Robert prepares to leave Good Wood Lawyers but his illness causes him to faint. Luckily, Martin is able to catch Robert before he falls to the ground.
Once Robert recovers and is able to talk, he explains to Martin that he wants to begin legal proceedings against Burnside Medical Centre.
Martin's eyes light up. He also has some serious issues against the Burnside Medical Centre.
Martin's sister had produced a natural remedy for auto-immune disorders. She had made a compound using only natural substances. The natural remedy, "Immune Reinforcer", contained no pharmaceutical compounds. Instead, it used a mixture of Tumeric, Ginger, Apple Cider vinegar, Flaxseed and Epsom salts.
However, the head doctor at Burnside Medical Centre filed a complaint with the Therapeutic Goods Administration against "Immune Reinforcer". As a result, "Immune Reinforcer" is currently under evaluation and will not be available for commercial sale until the review process is complete. However, the review does not prevent private sale between individuals.
Robert asks if "Immune Reinforcer" actually works. Martin assures him that it's a very good product. He then pulls out 2 bottles from his desk drawer. The bottles only have the front label with the product's name.
Robert buys one of the bottles for $50. On the invoice, he notices an item at the bottom under a heading that says "Exclusion Clause". However, the text under the heading has been smeared by the printer, making it unreadable.
Martin says, "sorry, our printer is on the fritz. Oh, and we're still waiting for the manufacturer to send us the back labels that list the ingredients and possible allergens."
Robert says, "that's ok. I'm not allergic to anything so I'll be ok".
Robert goes home and takes two tablets of "Immune Reinforcer". He then goes to sleep.
Later that evening, Robert wakes up with a burning sensation in his stomach. He runs to the bathroom and sees his reflection. He is covered in blisters and has a rash on his face.
In the morning, he calls Martin. Robert yells, "these pills you sold me have made me incredibly ill. I'm worse now than before. I'm going to sue you."
Martin simply smiles and says "Go for it. You can't do anything because I have an exclusion clause. It's on your invoice."
Martin then reads the Exclusion clause to Robert over the phone. It says:
All consumption of Immune Reinforcer takes place at the customer's risk. Good Wood Lawyers and its employees accept no liability for any damage, injury, or consequential loss, whatsoever caused, when a customer is using Immune Reinforcer as ordered by a doctor
Robert has to visit another doctor to deal with the burning stomach, rash and blisters. The doctor confirms that Robert has been injured quite badly. The Epsom salts caused a severe peptic ulcer to develop. Also, it turns out that Robert is severely allergic to Flaxseed.
Robert wants compensation from Good Wood Lawyers for his pain and suffering.
Advise Robert whether he will be able to be awarded compensation and damages from Good Wood Lawyers. When answering this question, focus on the rules for Exemption Clauses in Contract Law. if Robert had taken the pills and then developed a rash, he could sue Good Wood Lawyers for negligence. Analysis this? However, with the exclusion clause in place, Robert cannot sue the company for any losses he suffers as a result of taking the pills. Was the Exclusion clause in place? Would a judge say that the Exclusion clause was: It is expressly set out in a written contract that has been signed by the parties Was it on the invoice? Was there a written contract? It is expressly brought to the attention of the other party by reasonable notice given before the contract was formed or When was the "contract" for the Immune Reinforcer formed? At what point did Robert accept that offer? Had he seen the exclusion clause by that point?it is implied into the contract as a result of prior dealings between parties Had Robert and Martin had previous dealings? In other words, had Robert and Martin done this kind of deal before?
There was no label on the bottle. The printer was on the fritz. The exclusion clause was read to him over the phone after the rash and ulcer had developed Explore how Robert could get the company to reward/compensate for him being in this condition?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started