use IRAC method for answers

Question 1 (10 marks) Laila advertised in a local newspaper. The advert states, "For sale, rare pottery collection, OMR 300. Contact 07557123456" On Monday, Jolly saw the advertisement and telephoned Laila expressing his interest in the collection. Laila said that as Jolly was obviously a very keen collector, she would let him have the items for OMR 200, Jolly then offered OMR 150. Laila said she would think about it and get back to him the following day. On Tuesday Dolly saw the advertisement and contacted Laila. Dolly asked Laila what the minimum price she would accept for the collection. Laila replied stating that the minimum she would accept is OMR 275. Dolly said that she accepted the offer over the phone and would be in touch later that week to finalise the details. On Wednesday, Laila met up with her friend, Jassem, who expressed interest in the pottery collection. He offered OMR 400 for the collection and Laila agreed to sell immediately. That lunchtime a mutual friend, Diana, told Jolly and Dolly about the pottery Jassem had just bought from Laila. Jolly and Dolly are both very cross as the pottery is worth at least OMR 500, and are demanding that Laila sell them the Pottery collection. Advise the parties legal position and the remedies, if any. Question 2 (10 marks) Last week, Naila sent an email to Sumaiya, making the following offers: () An offer to lease her apartment in Sohar to Sumaiya, 'for as long as you wish to live there'. (ii) An offer to sell her car for OMR 6,000. Sumaiya immediately responded and accepted Naila's offer for the apartment. As for the other offer, Sumaiya replied that she would be willing to take the car for OMR 5,000 but Naila refused. A day later, Sumaiya wrote to Naila and said that she will accept Naila's original offer at OMR 6,000. However, Naila now refuses to grant the lease as well as to sell the car to Sumaiya. Discuss the legal position of Naila and Sumaiya