Use the informations belo to answer the question.

Part 2 Section B Temp... 3. Non-compensatory strategy: Multiple hurdle system Rejected applicant (name) Hurdle 1: None, all applicants have at least high school diploma or GED. Education Hurdle 2: Hurdle 3: Hurdle 4: Hurdle 5: Hurdle 6: 1. At the end of hurdle 6, which applicant(s) remained? 2. What would you recommend if you had no remaining applicants or several applicants remaining? 3. Do you prefer this method over the multiple cutoff method? Why or why not? Part 2 Section B Temp... SHRM Case: Selection Part 2B 1. Non-compensatory strategy a. Based on your knowledge and experience with bank tellers, create a cutoff for each of the six factors in the table below Cutoff for each assessment Education The applicant must have at least a high school diploma or GED Work experience Math skills Verification knowledge Interpersonal skills Work motivation 2. Non-compensatory Multiple Cutoff Apply your cutoffs listed in the table above to the four applicants. i Which applicant(s) remains? _ i If no applicant met all of the cutoffs, would you rather lower the cutoffs or restart the recruiting process? Why? iii If many applicants exceed the cutoffs, would you rather increase the cutoff levels, hire all remaining applicants (if possible) or take a compensatory approach for those that exceeded all of the cutoffs? Why? 3. Non-compensatory strategy: Multiple hurdle system Rejected applicant (name) Hurdle 1: None, all applicants have at least high school diploma or GED. Education Hurdle 2: | Hurdle 3: Hurdie'4: EEEE Hurdle 5: 9:34 K SHRM Case Part 1 B 1 of 2 Work Experience assessed via Application Form 20 points 5 or more years of relevant experience 15 points 3-4 years of relevant experience 10 points 1-2 years of relevant experience 5 points Some relevant experience (less than 1 year) Reject No relevant work experience Math Skills assessed via Math Test or Problem-Solving Exercises 8 points Advanced proficiency in mathematical concepts (e.g., calculus, statistics 6 points Proficient in algebra and basic mathematical operations 4 points Basic understanding of mathematical concepts 2 points Limited mathematical skills Reject Poor or no mathematical skills Verification Knowledge assessed via Test or Interview Questions 12 points Extensive experience with verification processes and tools 9 Points Proficient in verification techniques and software 6 Points Familiar with verification methodologies 3 Points Limited understanding of verification processes Reject No knowledge of verification processes Interpersonal Skills assessed via Interview or Behavioral Assessment 10 points Excellent communication and teamwork skills demonstrated in previous roles 7 Points Good interpersonal skills with evidence of collaboration 5 Points Adequate interpersonal skills, but room for improvement 3 Points Limited interpersonal skills Reject Poor interpersonal skills Work Motivation assessed via Interview or Personality Assessment. 15 points Consistently demonstrated high motivation and initiative in previous positions 10 Points Demonstrated motivation and drive in past roles 5 Points Adequate motivation, but occasional lack of initiative 3 Points Limited motivation, requires constant supervision Reject No motivation or initiative demonstrated