Use the internet to research litigation against Blitz USA for explosions involving portable plastic gas cans.

• Based on research, respond to the following questions:
• could Blitz be held strictly liable in some or all of these cases? Why?
• are the gas cans produced by Blitz defective due to the lack of a flame arrestor? If so, what type of product defect might apply?
• Did Blitz acted unethically by not installing a flame arrestor knowing that the risk existed for catastrophic injury if the product was not used properly? Explain your answer.
• In some instances, users have admitted misusing the product by pouring gasoline out of the container directly onto an open flame. In these cases could Blitz still be held liable for the plaintiffs' injuries? Does the plaintiff bear partial responsibility in these instances? If so, does this impact the plaintiff's ability to recover damages?