Question
USE THE REFERENCE BELOW Issue: What overarching issue was the court addressing or resolving (one questions not a paragraph just one sentence encapsulating) Facts: What
USE THE REFERENCE BELOW
Issue: What overarching issue was the court addressing or resolving (one questions not a paragraph just one sentence encapsulating)
Facts: What are the facts that the court described and cared about?
facts section should only include the actual facts of the case.
Rule of Law:What rule please mention the statue, case, legal principle mentioned in the images, did the court apply
*rule of law segment should only include the actual statutes, constitutional amendments or cases the Court applies the facts
Application- how did the court apply the rule to the facts?
*application section should be how the Court applied the facts to the law
Conclusion: what result did the court reach and WHY?
Flippo v. West Virgina
One night in 1996, petitioner and his wife were vacationing at a cabin in a state park. After petitioner called 911 to report that they had been attacked, the police arrived to find petitioner waiting outside the cabin, with injuries to his head and legs. After questioning him, an officer entered the building and found the body of petitioner's wife, with fatal head wounds. The officers closed off the area, took petitioner to the hospital, and searched the exterior and environs of the cabin for footprints or signs of forced entry. When a police photographer arrived at about 5:30 a.m., the officers reentered the building and proceeded to "process the crime scene." For over 16 hours, they took photographs, collected evidence, and searched through the contents of the cabin. They found among other things, a briefcase on a table, which they opened, in which they found and seized various photographs and negatives.
The photographs included several taken of a man who appears to be taking off his jeans. He was later identified as Joel Boggess, a friend of petitioner and a member of the congregation of which petitioner was the minister. At trial, the prosecution introduced the photographs as evidence of petitioner's relationship with Mr. Boggess and argued that the victim's displeasure with this relationship was one of the reasons that petitioner may have been motivated to kill her.
Result 1 of 1 in this book for Petitioner sought to suppress the photographs on the grounds that the police did not obtain a warrant and that no exception to the warrant requirement justified the search and Clear search seizureStep by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started