used the Reasonable Foreseeability/Reasonable Reliance Choose... Royal Bank of Canada v. Gill Test to reduce the scope of a Hercules Management v. Ernst & Young representor's potentially infinite Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company liability. Rylands v. Fletcher Anns v. Merton, London Borough Council Selkirk Petroleum Products Ltd. v. Husky Oil Ltd. This case created a two-stage test R. v. Spratt for determining the existence of a More v. Bauer Nike Hockey Inc. duty of care. AMJ Campbell v. Kord Products Inc. Baid v. Aliments Rinag Foods Inc. Yin v. Liu This case clarifies the courts Chopra v. Eaton (T.) Co. position on mistake and Hadley v. Baxendale Haig v. Bamford rectification and how the courts will Donoghue v. Stevenson not accept mistake to rectify a contract unless it is clear that the Choose... parties both intended for the document to read a certain way