Using: Armstrong v. Moore, 2020 ONCA 49 and Larissa Katz entitled "Exclusion and Exclusivity in Property Law".

Can you help me with these questions?

1. What is theprimary legal issueArmstrong v Moore? Provide only 1 issue.

2. What was decided inArmstrong by the final court to hear the case?

3. Is this case important to Canadian society in your opinion( think critically)? Why or why not?Support your answer.

4. Use Katz's theory of property ownership to explain what eventually happened to the outhouse that is the subject of theArmstrong case.

5. hat legal matter does theArmstrong have in common with theDowney case (aside from the obvious fact of a dispute about property)?