Using IRAC on number 1 only (no need to use IRAC on 2 and 3), respond to the following hypotheticals Business Law Susan is the president of United Food Corporation, a wholesale grocery company An inspection by Tim, a government agent, uncovers unsanitary conditions caused by Val, a United employee, in the United warehouse Will, a United vice president, assures Tim that the situation will be corrected, but nothing is done, which a later inspection reveals Susan knows nothing about any of this Can United be convicted of a crime in these circumstances Can Susan be held criminally liable Hardcore Cop arrests Randy for alleged bank robbery Before he says anything else, Hardcore says, You might as well admit it now and save us both a lot of time Randy looks at him and replies, All right, I did itare you happy Is Randys confession admissible Why why not Hardcore Cop enters a house with a valid search warrant that states he can search for and seize any firearms such as guns, pistols However, Hardcore sees a large bag of cocaine lying on the coffee table and seizes that as well Cocaine owner claims Cop had no right to take cocaine Who wins and why

The Answer is in the image, click to view ...

Answered step by step

Verified Expert Solution

Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Posted on Aug 05, 2024

Using IRAC on number 1 only (no need to use IRAC on 2 and 3), respond to the following hypotheticals: Business Law

Susan is the president of United Food Corporation, a wholesale grocery company. An inspection by Tim, a government agent, uncovers unsanitary conditions caused by Val, a United employee, in the United warehouse. Will, a United vice president, assures Tim that the situation will be corrected, but nothing is done, which a later inspection reveals. Susan knows nothing about any of this. Can United be convicted of a crime in these circumstances? Can Susan be held criminally liable?
Hardcore Cop arrests Randy for alleged bank robbery. Before he says anything else, Hardcore says, You might as well admit it now and save us both a lot of time. Randy looks at him and replies, All right, I did itare you happy? Is Randys confession admissible? Why/ why not?
Hardcore Cop enters a house with a valid search warrant that states he can search for and seize any firearms such as guns, pistols. However, Hardcore sees a large bag of cocaine lying on the coffee table and seizes that as well. Cocaine owner claims Cop had no right to take cocaine. Who wins and why?