Using McDonald's hot coffee case, answer the following questions with Sources of each answer separate:

1. Is hot coffee so dangerous, as the jury thought?

2. Should a reasonable consumer be expected to know that coffee can burn and to have assumed this risk?

3. Is a warning label sufficient? Is our society too protective of consumers these days, or not protective enough?

4. In serving such hot coffee, did McDonald's act in a morally responsible way?

5. What ideals, obligations, and effects should it have taken into consideration?