Using the images listed below answer the following question What is the relationship between race and crime in Canada?

4. accorolng to NLS Interview data, in urban areas 25 percent or the respondents wer white and 22 percent were black. In rural areas, 92 percent of the respondents were white and 3 percent were black. Overall, 48 percent of the respondents resided in urban areas and 52 percent resided in rural areas. The NCS rate of offending data appearing in Table 'I were standardized to reflect the racial distribution in the total population lie, 35 percent white and 15 percent black]. 5. Rates were also standardized for age and sex differences in the population compositions in urban and rural areas, respectively. It was found thatthe stan ar Izc rates hardly differed from the non-standardized rates. This remained true for both violent and theft victimizations as well as for total personal victimization rates. Thus, independently standardizing for the different sex and age population compositions ir urban and rural areas does not change the pattern of the urbanrural comparisons. IS. Note that in the Uniform Crime Reports, robbery is classified as a violent crime {sec Webster, 1923:32}. This research, however, categorizes robbery as a crime of theftrproperty. It is argued here that the basic aim of robbery is theft of cash andror property. Any injury resulting to the victim is an unfortunate byproduct of the event. Throughout this paper, robbery will be classified as a theft crime. 2. Regional data would have been helpful in assessingthe racial population characteristics of urban and rural areas. For example, in Northeast and North Central urban areas, whites make up approximately 33 percent of the population. In rural areas, in these regions, 98 percent of the population is white. Similar figures were generated by the NCS data for the United States as a whole. However, in the South ar West some differences appear. In the South, urban areas consist of approximately Sq percent white and rural areas are 82 percent white. In the West, urban areas are mad up of SD percent white and rural areas, 92 percent white, {U.S. Bureau of the 1922}. Thus, on a regional basis the differences in racial composition in Wham 1972). Thus, on a regional basis the differences in racial composition in urban and rura areas may be significant. Unfortunately, the national victimization crime survey data cannot be classified by region, so the data presented are not as specific as one would have liked. 8. According to NCS interview data, 44 percent of the white respondents lived in urban areas and 56 percent resided in rural areas. In contrast, 72 percent of the black respondents lived in urban areas and 28 percent resided in rural areas. Overall, 85 percent of the respondents were white and 15 percent were black. The NCS rate of offending data appearing in Table 2 were standardized to reflect the urban-rural distribution in the total population (i.e., 48 percent urban and 52 percent rural). 9. As indicated, in all of the preceding cases, the total population was taken as the standard population and the age, sex, and race population compositions were standardized independently. The urban and rural rates of total personal victimization were also standardized to the trivariate age, sex, and race population composition within urban and rural areas. The urban and rural non- standardized rates (per 100,000) are 6,089 and 2,143 respectively. The standardized rates (per 100,000) are 5,363 and 2,671 in urban and rural areas. Thus, there is some reduction in the difference between the rates when standardizing for the trivariate age, sex, and race population composition. The urban-rural ratio for the non-standardized rates Priva