Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

####Using the information to create a draft BPMN model of the as-is credit application process in Signavio as a single model. Make appropriate assumptions. ####do

image text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribed

####Using the information to create a draft BPMN model of the as-is credit application process in Signavio as a single model. Make appropriate assumptions.

####do not copy answers similar found in chegg please.

#### i need a bpmn model that looks like a flowchart.

###### THIS IS THE COMPLETE QUESTION#####

Develop the following process in Signavio. Submit the process models as pdf file. As a process analyst working for a financial institution, you are engaged in a project that aims at improving the company's credit application process. The first step is to model the as-is process. You have interviewed a few representatives for three key roles participating in this process: customer service, corporate risk assessor and risk management. The relevant parts of the interview transcripts for each role are provided below. Customer service: "After I receive a credit application from the customer, I check if the application is complete. If the application is incomplete, I send a request for clarification to the customer. Once I receive this clarification, I check the application again for completeness. When I assess the application as complete, I pass it on to a corporate risk assessor. I then prepare some further marketing material [e.g., a selection of investment options] for the customer. After that, I will eventually receive one of the following: a. A notification of approval from the corporate risk assessor, b. A notification of rejection from the corporate risk assessor, or c. A request for clarification from the risk manager. In case of [a], I send a credit approval together with the marketing material to the customer, after which the process is finished for me. In case of [b], I send a credit rejection, after which the process is finished for me. In case of [c], I send a request for clarification to the customer. After receiving the clarification, I pass it on to the risk manager. I will then receive again one of the three documents listed above". Corporate risk assessor: "When I receive a credit application from the customer service, I first check it. Afterwards, I send it to the risk manager, from whom I then receive either a notification of approval or a notification of rejection. In both cases, I forward the notification to the customer service, after which the process is finished for me". Risk manager: "After receiving a credit application from the corporate risk assessor, I check it for completeness. If it is not complete, I send a request for clarification to the customer service. After the customer service responds with a clarification, I check the credit application again. Once an application successfully passes the completeness check, I assess its content. There are three possible outcomes of this assessment: - The credit application satisfies our criteria for approval. In this case, I send a notification of approval to the corporate risk assessor. Then I formally authorize the credit in our IT systems, after which the process is finished for me. - The credit application does not satisfy our criteria for approval. In this case, I send a notification of rejection to the corporate risk assessor, after which the process is finished for me. - Some information in the application is unclear. In this case, I send a request for clarification to the customer service. After receiving the clarification, I assess the content of the credit application once again. This leads to one of the three outcomes listed here". Next, you took an active role in observing how this process works by acting as the customer. Using a fake identity [in agreement with the process owner], you triggered this process several times and came up with the following observations. Customer: To apply for credit, the customer needs to fill out a credit application and send it to the financial institution. They will eventually get a response, which can be either: - A credit approval with additional marketing material or a credit rejection. In these two cases, the process is finished for the customer. - A request for clarification. In this case, the customer can proceed by preparing a clarification and sending it to the financial institution. After that, he or she will get a response that may be a credit approval with additional marketing material, a credit rejection, or again a request for clarification. - Some information in the application is unclear. In this case, I send a request for clarification to the customer service. After receiving the clarification, I assess the content of the credit application once again. This leads to one of the three outcomes listed here". Next, you took an active role in observing how this process works by acting as the customer. Using a fake identity [in agreement with the process owner], you triggered this process several times and came up with the following observations. Customer: To apply for credit, the customer needs to fill out a credit application and send it to the financial institution. They will eventually get a response, which can be either: - A credit approval with additional marketing material or a credit rejection. In these two cases, the process is finished for the customer. - A request for clarification. In this case, the customer can proceed by preparing a clarification and sending it to the financial institution. After that, he or she will get a response that may be a credit approval with additional marketing material, a credit rejection, or again a request for clarification. Using the information above, create a draft BPMN model of the as-is credit application process in Signavio as a single model. Make appropriate assumptions. Develop the following process in Signavio. Submit the process models as pdf file. As a process analyst working for a financial institution, you are engaged in a project that aims at improving the company's credit application process. The first step is to model the as-is process. You have interviewed a few representatives for three key roles participating in this process: customer service, corporate risk assessor and risk management. The relevant parts of the interview transcripts for each role are provided below. Customer service: "After I receive a credit application from the customer, I check if the application is complete. If the application is incomplete, I send a request for clarification to the customer. Once I receive this clarification, I check the application again for completeness. When I assess the application as complete, I pass it on to a corporate risk assessor. I then prepare some further marketing material [e.g., a selection of investment options] for the customer. After that, I will eventually receive one of the following: a. A notification of approval from the corporate risk assessor, b. A notification of rejection from the corporate risk assessor, or c. A request for clarification from the risk manager. In case of [a], I send a credit approval together with the marketing material to the customer, after which the process is finished for me. In case of [b], I send a credit rejection, after which the process is finished for me. In case of [c], I send a request for clarification to the customer. After receiving the clarification, I pass it on to the risk manager. I will then receive again one of the three documents listed above". Corporate risk assessor: "When I receive a credit application from the customer service, I first check it. Afterwards, I send it to the risk manager, from whom I then receive either a notification of approval or a notification of rejection. In both cases, I forward the notification to the customer service, after which the process is finished for me". Risk manager: "After receiving a credit application from the corporate risk assessor, I check it for completeness. If it is not complete, I send a request for clarification to the customer service. After the customer service responds with a clarification, I check the credit application again. Once an application successfully passes the completeness check, I assess its content. There are three possible outcomes of this assessment: - The credit application satisfies our criteria for approval. In this case, I send a notification of approval to the corporate risk assessor. Then I formally authorize the credit in our IT systems, after which the process is finished for me. - The credit application does not satisfy our criteria for approval. In this case, I send a notification of rejection to the corporate risk assessor, after which the process is finished for me. - Some information in the application is unclear. In this case, I send a request for clarification to the customer service. After receiving the clarification, I assess the content of the credit application once again. This leads to one of the three outcomes listed here". Next, you took an active role in observing how this process works by acting as the customer. Using a fake identity [in agreement with the process owner], you triggered this process several times and came up with the following observations. Customer: To apply for credit, the customer needs to fill out a credit application and send it to the financial institution. They will eventually get a response, which can be either: - A credit approval with additional marketing material or a credit rejection. In these two cases, the process is finished for the customer. - A request for clarification. In this case, the customer can proceed by preparing a clarification and sending it to the financial institution. After that, he or she will get a response that may be a credit approval with additional marketing material, a credit rejection, or again a request for clarification. - Some information in the application is unclear. In this case, I send a request for clarification to the customer service. After receiving the clarification, I assess the content of the credit application once again. This leads to one of the three outcomes listed here". Next, you took an active role in observing how this process works by acting as the customer. Using a fake identity [in agreement with the process owner], you triggered this process several times and came up with the following observations. Customer: To apply for credit, the customer needs to fill out a credit application and send it to the financial institution. They will eventually get a response, which can be either: - A credit approval with additional marketing material or a credit rejection. In these two cases, the process is finished for the customer. - A request for clarification. In this case, the customer can proceed by preparing a clarification and sending it to the financial institution. After that, he or she will get a response that may be a credit approval with additional marketing material, a credit rejection, or again a request for clarification. Using the information above, create a draft BPMN model of the as-is credit application process in Signavio as a single model. Make appropriate assumptions

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Auditing And Assurance Services

Authors: Alvin Arens, Randal J. Elder

14th Global Edition

0273755013, 978-0273755012

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions

Question

Identify how organizations use GEOS, LEOS, and MEOS, respectively.

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Describe sources of ethical guidance.

Answered: 1 week ago