Vishwajeet owns a dog grooming business and needs patient people to work there. He gives all applicants a test he obtained from a management firm that has been proven to measure psychological traits such as patience. Swapna, alleges sex discrimination after she fails the test miserably and Vishwajeet refuses to hire her. Vishwajeet tells her that there is no way he is giving her a dime because he is entitled to protect his client's dogs. Upon learning that her state lacked a state office representing the Equal Opportunity Commission, Swapna, immediately sues him in federal court alleging a violation of Title VII. Vishwajeet, who is getting tired of the dog grooming business, also opens a new formal wear shop and needs to hire employees there as well. He wants to appeal to high school and college$-$age young ladies attending proms and formals. Vishwajeet decides that he does not want older sales clerks to assist in choosing formal dresses. He only wants young, attractive ones. Vishwajeet runs an ad in the local paper seeking applicants for sales clerks and stating that a qualification for the job is computer training while in high school. Tina, age $60,$ applies and tells Vishwajeet that while she sees no reason that computer training should be required, she attended computer training in adult education and has excellent computer and sales skills. Vishwajeet refuses to hire her, telling her that unless he follows the ad$,$ he may be seen as practicing discrimination. Deciding that formal wear is more trouble than dogs, Vishwajeet shuts down the formal wear store. Which of the following is true regarding Swapna,$$s lawsuit against Vishwajeet in federal court?