Warnerwoods Company uses a perpetual inventory system. It entered into the following purchases and sales transactions for March.

$\backslash$table$[[$Date$,$Activities,Units,Acquired at cost$,$Units sold at Retail$],[$March $1,$Beginning inventory,$60$ units,e $$50\mathrm{.}20$ per unit,$],[$March $5,$Purchase,$205$ units,$2$ $$55\mathrm{.}20$ per unit,$],[$March $9,$Sales,,,$220$ units $$85\mathrm{.}20$ per unit$],[$March $18,$Purchase,$65$ units,e $$60\mathrm{.}20$ per unit,$],[$March $25,$Purchase,$110$ units,@ $$62\mathrm{.}20$ per unit,$],[$March $29,$Sales,,,$90$ units $$95\mathrm{.}20$ per unit$],[$Totals$,440$ units,,$310$ units$]]$

Problem $5-1$A $($Algo$)$ Part $3$

$3.$ Compute the cost assigned to ending inventory using $($a$)$ FIFO. $($b$)$ LIFO. $($c$)$ weighted average, and $($d$)$ specific identification. For specific identification, units sold include $45$ units from beginning inventory. $175$ units from the March $5$ purchase. $25$ units from the March $18$ purchase, and $65$ units from the March $25$ purchase.

Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below.

$\backslash$table$[[$Perpetual FIFO,Perpetual LIFO,$\backslash$table$[[$Weighted$],[$Average$]]]]$

Compute the cost assigned to ending inventory using specific identification. For specific identification, units sold include $45$ units from beginning units from the March $5$ purchase, $25$ units from the March $18$ purchase, and $65$ units from the March $25$ purchase.

$\backslash$table$[[$Specific Identification$],[$Date$,$Goods Available for Sale,Cost of Goods Sold,Ending Inventory$],[$# of units,$\backslash$table$[[$Cost per$],[$unit$]],\backslash$table$[[$Cos$],[$Av$]],,\backslash$table$[[$# of units$],[$sold$]],$Cos,$\backslash$table$[[$per$],[$it$]],\backslash$table$[[$Cost of$],[$Goods Sold$]],\backslash$table$[[$# of units$],[$in ending$],[$inventory$]],$Cos,$\backslash$table$[[$per$],[$it$]],\backslash$table$[[$Ending$],[$Inventory$]]],[$March $1,$r$,,$$$,0,,$$$,0\mathrm{.}00,0,,$s$,0\mathrm{.}00,$$