Watch the following: Cayla Griffin vs Albanese Enterprise, Inc 08072020 PART 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlEIlEv-RSQ&t=10s Cayla Griffin vs Albanese Enterprise, Inc 08102020 AM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnBIdBcj7d8 Cayla Griffin vs Albanese Enterprise, Inc 08102020 PM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKBb9eg-GxM What theme can be seen throughout the trial? Which state court was this proceeding in? (name of court) What is the jurisdiction of this court? (County or Circuit) Names of the participants: Presiding Judge; Counsels, Plaintiff, Defendant or witnesses. Any other relevant participants not listed above, such as the bailiff or members of the courtroom work group. Facts and substance of the activity. Clearly describe what proceedings took place during your observation. What did you see? What type of proceeding was it? What were the issues being debated and discussed? Who participated and to what degree? Who did not participate? Make sure to include a discussion of the Voir Dire Process Were the participants (lawyers) prepared and professional? Did they seem interested in best representing their client? Was the judge a participant or an observer? How active was the judge in the proceedings? Was the judge professional and prepared? Were the issues resolved to anyone's satisfaction? How did the courtroom observation fit within your expectations of the judicial process? Compare and contrast your observation and the judicial process described in your readings. Return to your theme. What can you conclude? What conclusions or implications about the judicial process can you make from your observation? What conclusions or implications about justice in the United States can you make from your observations? Was this a worthwhile learning experience? Why or why not