We are continuing to talk about juvenile cases that where heard by the Supreme Court that have set precedents for the rights that you hold today. Please read the article link and watch the video link regarding the case-Safford Unified School District Redding and answer the following questions: 1. According to the article, what "two questions of keen interest to administrators" does this case present? 2. In your own words (using both the article and video) what do you believe caused Savannah to be searched? Why do you think the school thought it was so important to do a search like that? 3. What precedent (Supreme Court case previously ruled upon) was used by the school to justify this action? 4. Watch the video regarding the case from question 3 and respond to the questions below: . You read about this case in the last assignment. Share one fact you learned from the video that you did not know previously. . What term was used to describe the amount of evidence law enforcement needs to get a search warrent? . What is the amount of evidence (term used) that a school needs in order to conduct a search of a student's possessions (hint: it is more than a "hunch.")? . What "rule" did not have to be followed by the school according to the Supreme Court? . Which Amendment did T.L.O.'s attorney say was violated? 5. The Supreme Court ruled that this type of search in the Redding case was Unconstitutional in this situation, but did grant the school officials qualified immunity. What does qualified immunity mean? 6. Please share your opinion on the Redding case. Do you agree or disagree with the Court's ruling? Do you agree with some of the Supreme Court justices when they argued that this type of search would be appropriate for a more severe or dangerous drug? What do you think you would have done in middle school if you were Savannah? Make sure to explain all of your answers