We learned about several approaches in these first two modules. Situational leadership theory, Fiedler's contingency theory, path-goal theory, the Vroom-Yetton-Jago model, and the substitutes for leadership model all suggest leaders should adapt to the situation, which often includes their followers and task characteristics. Fiedler's contingency theory, on the other hand, says leaders have a dominant style that is not easily adaptable, and they should be placed in situations that could benefit from their dominant style.

1. Which of the contingency models from this week appears to be most useful to you and your role as a leader and/or follower? Explain why this theory resonates with you.
2. In what kinds of situations are you most effective as a leader? In what kinds of situations are you least effective and may need some improvement? Consider some of the situational variables highlighted in the various contingency theories that contributed to your effectiveness.
3. Why is self-awareness critical to a leader's success? Can you think of some specific negative consequences that might result from a leader not having self-awareness? How can we become more self-aware of our blind spots? What specific experiences or learning activities may help increase our self-awareness?