We spent have spent a great deal of time talking about the intersection of market-based/economic policies in class because, in the end, everything has to be paid for. Consider our textbook chapter for this week and what it has to say about economic concerns and risk. Using the chapter as a guide, you will recall that Rush writes of capitalists taking a stronger role in climate change: "The financial calculus is obvious. As the climate crisis continues, the risk of doing nothing is rising and the money is moving." How does his article exemplify or diverge from the thinking about risk in the chapter? As you respond, make sure you cite something specific from both our chapter and Rush's article to anchor your thinking. Even though it's not a required part of the question, you might consider that this is exactly the sort of question your boss might ask of you someday in order to carve out a business opportuinty or as a way to advertise a new idea or position for your work.

Article:

• Dominic Rush - "'Reading the Writing on the Wall': Why Wall Street is Acting on the Climate Crisis"