Question
Wellington Chemicals Division This case is set in 1965 in a division of a major UK-based chemicals firm when the exchange rate was $2.80/, inflation
Wellington Chemicals Division
This case is set in 1965 in a division of a major UK-based
chemicals firm when the exchange rate was $2.80/, inflation was about 4% per
year, and a chemical worker was paid about 3,000 per year. The issue is_make versus buy
for packaging containers. The container is technologically advanced and is an
important element of the value of the end product to the customer.
The
Wellington Chemicals Division manufactures and sells a range of "hard to
hold" chemical products throughout Great Britain. Since these products
require careful packing and storing, the company has always promoted the
special properties of the containers it uses. In fact, a major element of
Wellington's marketing strategy is its container. The containers are large
steel drums with a unique, patented, spray-on lining made from a specialty
chemical known as GHL. Each drum weighs about 260 pounds and holds about 500
gallons which is about 1.25 tons. The firm operates a department especially to
maintain its containers in good condition and to make new ones to replace those
that are past repair. Wellington is making 3,000 new containers each year and
repairing 4,000 used containers, There are 12,000 containers in circulation (an
average 4 year life) and containers average 3 round trips per year. Thus, on
average, each container is used 12 times and repaired 1.33 times during its
life.
Mr.
Walsh, the division general manager, has for some time suspected that the firm
might save money, and get equally good service, by buying its containers from an
outside source. After careful inquiries, he approached a firm specializing in
container production, Packages, Ltd., and asked for a quotation. At the same
time, he asked Mr. Dyer, his chief accountant, to provide him with an up-
to-date statement of the cost of operating the container department (see
below).
Within
a few days, the quotation from Packages, Ltd. came in. The firm was prepared to
supply all the new containers required (3,000 per year) for 125,000 per year,
the contract to run for a guaranteed term of five years and thereafter to be
renewable from year to year. If the required number of containers increased,
the contract price would be increased proportionally. Additionally, Packages
Ltd. would undertake to carry out purely maintenance work on containers, short
of replacement, for a sum of 37,500 per year, on the same contract terms.
Walsh estimated that Packages, Ltd. would make a 15% profit margin (before
taxes) on each of the contracts. They would only accept the maintenance work if
they were also manufacturing the new containers.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started