Wendy has been employed by Wheelin' U 'Round Company ("WURC") as a tire salesman for the last ten years. Jacques Von Sauer, looking for new tires, asked Wendy which tires work well on a car. Wendy showed Jacques a top-selling WURC tire, and Jacques paid for four of those tires. They were put on Jacques's car. While Jacques was leaving the parking lot with his new tires on his car, the front driver side tire burst and resulted in Jacques getting into an accident. If Jacques sues WURC in order to recover a damages award, what is the most likely result? O Jacques loses because there was no express warranty. Jacques wins because there was an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose. O Jacques loses, if WURC had the intellectual rights concerning the manufacture, licensing, and/or sale of the tires Jacques purchased. O Jacques loses unless he can show fraud. Jacques wins because there was an implied warranty of merchantability.