Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

What are some tax issues that must be considered by Innovative Concepts' management team when making the bid? 7. One of the M&A committee members

image text in transcribed
image text in transcribed
image text in transcribed
image text in transcribed
image text in transcribed
image text in transcribed
image text in transcribed
image text in transcribed
What are some tax issues that must be considered by Innovative Concepts' management team when making the bid? 7. One of the M&A committee members had told Dan that the main advantage of this deal to Innovative Concepts is the diversification benefit that exists from the two companies being in totally different industry sectors and that it be stressed the most in the presentation. Do you agree? Explain. 8. 28 Valuing Corporate Acquisitions Made for Each Other It was late Sunday night and Dan Peterman was getting weary. The big presentation was set for 8 am the next day and Dan kept remembering what Ray Machado, the chairman of the Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) committee had said to him. The board members are going to ask several tough questions at the meeting so we better prepare ourselves thoroughly. Make sure that we can substantiate all our numbers and justify all our assumptions." Dan and Ray were serving on the M&A committee, which had been formed by their CEO, Keith Overby, to "look into" possible candidates for acquisition. The three of them were employed by Innovative Concepts, a fairly large-sized manufacturing firm, headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, which produced unique metal products for household and commercial use. Formed in 1980, the company had seen better days. At the time of its inception, its industry sector was still in its infancy stage and Text Made for Each Other Companies 20 Case 28 Made for Each Other 139 competition was almost non-existent. As a result the company enjoyed significant growth over the years and was able to recruit excellent personnel, many of who stayed with the company right from the start. The firm had accumulated a significant amount of cash and built up a good credit history Over the past couple of years, however, due to fierce competition and a lackluster economy, the firm's scope of expansion had all but dried up, and the managers were hard pressed to search for alternative avenues for growth. The company's stock price had recently dropped to S45 per share. The overwhelming consensus in the boardroom was that the firm should look for suitable acquisition candidates so as to better utilize its resources and diversify its risk. About three months ago, the Chairman and CEO., Keith Overby set up the M&A committee to research possible acquisition candidates and present its findings at the quarterly board meeting. He asked the committee members to consider firms in related as well as unrelated industries and explain the rationale for their recommendations. After considerable research, data gathering, and analysis, the committee had narrowed their choices down to three possible candidates. After the presentation at the quarterly meeting in March, the Board of Directors had ruled out two of the three candidates and asked the committee to conduct further valuation and analysis on the third candidate -QuickResolve Products. The board members were particularly curious about the low P/E ratio that the firm was trading at. In fact, one board member had heard about "relative P/E magic" and was wondering whether by acquiring QuickResolve the firm could boost it's P/E ratio and possibly its earnings per share. QuickResolve Products, headquartered in Rockford, IlIlinois, was a mid-sized company with assets of $2 billion. The firm's earnings per share had been steadily increasing each year and were currently $1.20 per share. Surprisingly, however, the committee found that although the firm had a fairly well diversified customer base, its P/E ratio was rather low at 12.5X -much below the average P/E ratio for the industry. The committee felt that one reason for the low P/E ratio might have been the recent retirement of their CEO who had managed the company in a very centralized manner. All managers reported directly to him and he Text Valuing | dwer 2 Deafello: Cases in Finance Corporate Acquisitions Made for Each Other Case 28Made for Each Other 140 made most of the strategic decisions. His experience and vision had been well rewarded in the market. The members of the M&A committee felt that if QuickResolve were to be acquired by Innovative Concepts, production and market costs could be significantly reduced due to Innovative Conce technical and marketing expertise. The incremental net cash flows of the combined company were estimated to be at least $45 million per year the foresecable future. Moreover, since QuickResolve was involved in a totally different industrial sector there were some significant diversification benefits to be had. in for Tables 1-4 present the financial statements of Innovative Concepts and QuickResolve Products respectively. The finance department of Innovative Concepts' had recently estimated the firm's weighted average cost of capital to be 16% and the required rate of return on equity to be 20%. Since Dan had first suggested QuickResolve as a possible acquisition candidate, it was his job to provide the Board with the necessary information, clarification, and estimates. Dan firmly believed that QuickResolve and Innovative Concepts were 'made for each other! Now if only he could convince the board! Case 28 Made for Each Other 141 Table 1 Innovative Concepts Income Statement (S millions) Revenues Cost of Goods Sold Gross Profit Selling & Administration Expenses Depreciation Interest Earnings Before Taxes Taxes (40%) Net Income $3,000 4 Dividends Paid ($1 per share on 100 milion shares Addition to Retained Earnings Case 28 Made for Each Other 142 Table 2 Innovative Concepts Balance Sheet ($ millions) 400 Marketable Securities Accounts Receivable Inventory Total Current Assets 400 1,000 2000 6000 -2000 4000 Gross Fixed Assets Accumulated Depreciation Net Fixed Assets Total Assets 6000 300 200 500 1000 Accounts Payables Accruals Notes Payable Total Current Liabilities 2000 Long-term debt 500 1000 1500 3000 Common Stock (Par Value $5 per share) Capital Surplus Retained Earnings Total Shareholders' Equity Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity Made for Each Other Case 28 Made for Each Other 143 Table 3 QuickResolve Products Income Statement (S millions) Revenues Cost of Goods Sold Gross Profit Selling& Administration Expenses Depreciation Interest Earnings Before Taxes Taxes (40%) Net Income $1,500 Dividends Paid (S0.8per share on 50 million shares) Addition to Retained Earnings Made for Each Other Case 28 144 Table 4 QuickResolve Products Balance Sheet ($ millions) 300 200 200 300 1000 Cash Marketable Securities Accounts Receivable Inventory Total Current Assets 1400 Gross Fixed Assets Accumulated Depreciation Net Fixed Assets Total Assets 1000 20 150 130 500 780 Accounts Payables Accruals Notes Payable Total Current Liabilities 600 Long-term debt Common Stock (Par Value $2 per share) Capital Surplus Retained Earnings Total Shareholders' Equity Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity 100 340 180 620 What are some tax issues that must be considered by Innovative Concepts' management team when making the bid? 7. One of the M&A committee members had told Dan that the main advantage of this deal to Innovative Concepts is the diversification benefit that exists from the two companies being in totally different industry sectors and that it be stressed the most in the presentation. Do you agree? Explain. 8. 28 Valuing Corporate Acquisitions Made for Each Other It was late Sunday night and Dan Peterman was getting weary. The big presentation was set for 8 am the next day and Dan kept remembering what Ray Machado, the chairman of the Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) committee had said to him. The board members are going to ask several tough questions at the meeting so we better prepare ourselves thoroughly. Make sure that we can substantiate all our numbers and justify all our assumptions." Dan and Ray were serving on the M&A committee, which had been formed by their CEO, Keith Overby, to "look into" possible candidates for acquisition. The three of them were employed by Innovative Concepts, a fairly large-sized manufacturing firm, headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, which produced unique metal products for household and commercial use. Formed in 1980, the company had seen better days. At the time of its inception, its industry sector was still in its infancy stage and Text Made for Each Other Companies 20 Case 28 Made for Each Other 139 competition was almost non-existent. As a result the company enjoyed significant growth over the years and was able to recruit excellent personnel, many of who stayed with the company right from the start. The firm had accumulated a significant amount of cash and built up a good credit history Over the past couple of years, however, due to fierce competition and a lackluster economy, the firm's scope of expansion had all but dried up, and the managers were hard pressed to search for alternative avenues for growth. The company's stock price had recently dropped to S45 per share. The overwhelming consensus in the boardroom was that the firm should look for suitable acquisition candidates so as to better utilize its resources and diversify its risk. About three months ago, the Chairman and CEO., Keith Overby set up the M&A committee to research possible acquisition candidates and present its findings at the quarterly board meeting. He asked the committee members to consider firms in related as well as unrelated industries and explain the rationale for their recommendations. After considerable research, data gathering, and analysis, the committee had narrowed their choices down to three possible candidates. After the presentation at the quarterly meeting in March, the Board of Directors had ruled out two of the three candidates and asked the committee to conduct further valuation and analysis on the third candidate -QuickResolve Products. The board members were particularly curious about the low P/E ratio that the firm was trading at. In fact, one board member had heard about "relative P/E magic" and was wondering whether by acquiring QuickResolve the firm could boost it's P/E ratio and possibly its earnings per share. QuickResolve Products, headquartered in Rockford, IlIlinois, was a mid-sized company with assets of $2 billion. The firm's earnings per share had been steadily increasing each year and were currently $1.20 per share. Surprisingly, however, the committee found that although the firm had a fairly well diversified customer base, its P/E ratio was rather low at 12.5X -much below the average P/E ratio for the industry. The committee felt that one reason for the low P/E ratio might have been the recent retirement of their CEO who had managed the company in a very centralized manner. All managers reported directly to him and he Text Valuing | dwer 2 Deafello: Cases in Finance Corporate Acquisitions Made for Each Other Case 28Made for Each Other 140 made most of the strategic decisions. His experience and vision had been well rewarded in the market. The members of the M&A committee felt that if QuickResolve were to be acquired by Innovative Concepts, production and market costs could be significantly reduced due to Innovative Conce technical and marketing expertise. The incremental net cash flows of the combined company were estimated to be at least $45 million per year the foresecable future. Moreover, since QuickResolve was involved in a totally different industrial sector there were some significant diversification benefits to be had. in for Tables 1-4 present the financial statements of Innovative Concepts and QuickResolve Products respectively. The finance department of Innovative Concepts' had recently estimated the firm's weighted average cost of capital to be 16% and the required rate of return on equity to be 20%. Since Dan had first suggested QuickResolve as a possible acquisition candidate, it was his job to provide the Board with the necessary information, clarification, and estimates. Dan firmly believed that QuickResolve and Innovative Concepts were 'made for each other! Now if only he could convince the board! Case 28 Made for Each Other 141 Table 1 Innovative Concepts Income Statement (S millions) Revenues Cost of Goods Sold Gross Profit Selling & Administration Expenses Depreciation Interest Earnings Before Taxes Taxes (40%) Net Income $3,000 4 Dividends Paid ($1 per share on 100 milion shares Addition to Retained Earnings Case 28 Made for Each Other 142 Table 2 Innovative Concepts Balance Sheet ($ millions) 400 Marketable Securities Accounts Receivable Inventory Total Current Assets 400 1,000 2000 6000 -2000 4000 Gross Fixed Assets Accumulated Depreciation Net Fixed Assets Total Assets 6000 300 200 500 1000 Accounts Payables Accruals Notes Payable Total Current Liabilities 2000 Long-term debt 500 1000 1500 3000 Common Stock (Par Value $5 per share) Capital Surplus Retained Earnings Total Shareholders' Equity Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity Made for Each Other Case 28 Made for Each Other 143 Table 3 QuickResolve Products Income Statement (S millions) Revenues Cost of Goods Sold Gross Profit Selling& Administration Expenses Depreciation Interest Earnings Before Taxes Taxes (40%) Net Income $1,500 Dividends Paid (S0.8per share on 50 million shares) Addition to Retained Earnings Made for Each Other Case 28 144 Table 4 QuickResolve Products Balance Sheet ($ millions) 300 200 200 300 1000 Cash Marketable Securities Accounts Receivable Inventory Total Current Assets 1400 Gross Fixed Assets Accumulated Depreciation Net Fixed Assets Total Assets 1000 20 150 130 500 780 Accounts Payables Accruals Notes Payable Total Current Liabilities 600 Long-term debt Common Stock (Par Value $2 per share) Capital Surplus Retained Earnings Total Shareholders' Equity Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity 100 340 180 620

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Auditing In An Internet Of Things Environment

Authors: Robert R. Moeller

1st Edition

1119461669, 978-1119461661

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions