What are the key facts relevant to your conclusion?

of the rights or reputation of others" or "[f]or the protection of national security or of public order (order public), or of public health or morals."1 contrary, however, our statements are not protected in every environment. Consider your perspective on the following examples of employees' choices to express themselves. protect against terminations in direct violation of public policy, a court asked to review the case dismissed it because Briskman could not point to a particular statute that was violated. 2 permitted the case to go forward, in February 2019, he opted instead to withdraw the grievance after reaching a confidential settlement. 3 public. 4 Google's left bias has created a politically correct monoculture that maintains its hold by shaming dissenters into silence." and aesthetics." Damore's memo violated that commitment. withdrew. However, before that withdrawal, the NLRB found that his termination was legal based on the discriminatory nature of his statements. 6