1. What are the three approaches that jurisdictions take with respect to whether incarceration justifies relief from a child support obligation?
2. 2. What approach does the court adopt?
3. What considerations underlie this approach?
4. As reviewed here , what views Do other courts take with respect to these considerations?
5. At the end of the decision, court notes that's the result is "particularly appropriate" given that the father's incarceration stemmed from his sexual assault of his daughter-how significant do you think this factor is? do you think the result would have been the same if the incarceration was for reasons unrelated to his family? will this be a distinguishing factor in the future?

Yerkes v. yerkes 573 pa. 2003